Return to Digital Photography Articles
How to Undelete Photos from a Memory Card!
Even if you accidentally deleted your photos or formatted your memory card, it is usually possible to recover the photos!

Deleted Photos from Memory Card
One of the disadvantages of digital photography is the ease in which we can accidentally delete or format a memory card and instantly lose all of our photos!
It turns out that when you hit Delete or Format, it is almost always possible to get these photos back without any damage or corruption.
What to do if I deleted my Photos?
The following guidelines are absolutely essential to increase the odds that you can recover as many photos as possible:
- DO NOT take any more photos with this card.
- DO NOT copy or install any files to this card.
- DO set the card's Write Protect tab to Lock.
This is only usually an option with SD (Secure Digital) cards, but see if your card has such a slide switch. - DO recovery with advanced techniques.
The majority of recovery programs available on the web can only fix a portion of your deleted files, leaving many others behind.
*** Submit your Memory Card for Advanced Recovery! ***
In the near future I plan to release a tool that will allow you to recover your own photos. In advance of the release, I am occasionally accepting memory card data for custom analysis.
For a limited time, I will be analyzing and recovering deleted memory cards.
STATUS: Submissions Currently Offline, please check back later.
Not all JPEG Recovery Programs are the same
There are a huge number of JPEG recovery / undelete programs available on the web, many even for free. Unfortunately, the vast majority of these can only handle the simplest types of deleted files: unfragmented photos.
So, while these programs may recover dozens of your deleted photos without problem, it is highly likely that you will discover:
- You are missing many photos that should have been recovered
- The photos that were recovered are corrupted.
Ironically enough, it is often these simple recovery programs that generate the thousands of corrupted photos that I've analyzed over the years. The recovery software is often at fault for being too simplistic. Unfortunately, most users give up after seeing the results of their recovery, and assume that all recovery programs are alike. This is far from the case!

Reader's Comments:
I see from reading through your site that it may be possible to recover the rest of the large image. I opened it with JPEGsnoop and it does give a lot of errors like "Can't find huffman bitstring," and "bad huffman code," and "bad scan data in MCU," etc. I also tried running the detailed decode, but I haven't the foggiest idea of what I am looking for or looking at.
Do you think that this image could be saved? It would mean the world to my husband. Any information you could provide would be endlessly appreciated. Thanks again so much!!
-Christine
Thanks for the reply. Snoop detects the IRB for me, but it also detects non-Photoshop signatures and quality levels that match each other and the quality levels like those on your software list.
I tested each software by having it resave one of six identical copies of an image I made. All the software programs listed in Snoop that have the same signatures were used for my test. With the image quality at 91%, using 1 x 1 subsampling got good res That worked out OK, sinnce the result files
My problem is happening every time I use an MCU offset. It gives me the embedded thumbnail detail, 124 x 160, 72DPI, etc. It makes no difference in which direction I run it, when I get the "Consider using [Tools->Img Search Fwd/Rev," message. and the same results come back.
Most of the time, it does not like the starting block number as it will not let me use the Img Search Fwd. I have to use Img Search Bwd.
So, the thumbnals are always the same, 124 x 160, 72 dpi, 81.53 & 89.88 for chrominance and luminance values that match Photoshop Save at 05 but suggest one of the other editors you listed. Most likely, it was IrfanView, as I tried using all of the others you listed and a few of my own. Even though the quality levels are the same from editor to editor, the file size each program produces does not.
Why is that?
Please let me know whether this can be corrected, and if so, how so.
Can you please share some of your techniques? I have lots of images to fix, so I was wondering whether I could learn how to fix them by myself...You said that the steps were posted on 4-17. I don't see it. Can you please repost or send me an email? Thanks :)
JPEGSnoop is a great program. It helps me in my work. I used in in an experiment to see if I could find traces of Photoshop in a file that had a Photoshop IRB, but was then resaved in another editor - like one on those listed at the bottom as having the same compression signatures with both chrominance and luminance producing the same quality levels.
Here is what I did:
Using the grid, I picked an MCU offset that I felt was far enough into the iimage to recover Photoshop tables. It worked - well, I hope it did.
Instead of the "new version of existing software"message I got when I ran the entire file, it came back as Photoshop Save as 05.
I want to confirm that what I did here and what I found are valid, because if they are, then JPEGSnoop is a lifesaver.
Thanks,
PJ
Thank you so much! As I previously said, I spent about a month online contacting IT people and researching if it was possible to recover corrupted pics. You were the only person who seemed to be even slightly successful; every website said they were lost with no hope.
Thank you again for all the effort, you really went above and beyond in helping us.
Note: Comments on this article have been closed